top of page
< Back

Let’s not get stung by the Yellowjacket Project

Written by:

Luke Ruediger

In April 2025, Secretary of Agriculture  Brook Rollins issued a Secretarial Memo  aimed at increasing timber production on  National Forest lands. This action placed  over 112 million acres, approximately  58 percent of our National Forest lands,  including all of the Rogue River-Siskiyou  National Forest, under an “Emergency  Situation Determination,” or ESD. 


ESDs were intended to address  urgent, sudden, or unforeseen threats  to public safety or natural resources,  but they are now being used to approve  large logging projects on federal lands  where no urgent threat exists. The intent  is to fast-track timber extraction, bypass  traditional environmental analysis, cut out  public involvement opportunities, reduce  transparency, eliminate standard public  comment periods, eliminate objection  processes, and expedite logging projects  on public lands throughout the West,  including the Applegate Valley. 


Currently, National Forest Ranger  Districts across the West are implementing  increasingly large and damaging timber  sales with increasingly little to no public  involvement, little environmental analysis,  and virtually no limits on the scope,  scale, or intensity of logging that can be  proposed under ESD timber sales. 


Unfortunately, despite being  designated an Adaptive Management Area  (AMA) specifically for community-based  collaboration, the Rogue River-Siskiyou  National Forest is proposing its first ESD  timber sale in a very large portion of the  Applegate River watershed. The timber  sale, called the Yellowjacket Project,  covers potentially thousands of acres of  Applegate forests on the western face of  Wagner Butte, at the headwaters of the  Little Applegate River, on Glade Creek  and Yale Creek, as well as on Teel Creek  in the Upper Applegate River watershed,  along Elliott Ridge and Yellowjacket Ridge, and on the slopes of Acorn Woman  Mountain above Acorn Woman Lake.


Sprawling across much of the eastern Applegate River watershed, the commercial logging proposed in this project has  the potential to permanently damage  the forests, scenic viewsheds, wildfire  resilience, and habitat and watershed values  of the region. Recent field monitoring has  validated these concerns as we are finding mature, late-successional, and old-growth forests targeted for logging throughout the  timber sale area. We are also seeing that  many new, decommissioned, defunct,  and/or long unused roads and skid trails  would be developed to facilitate logging  operations, many large trees would be logged, and, as we are seeing in local BLM timber sales, mature hardwood trees would be almost universally removed during felling and yarding operations.  


With remote cameras, we have also  documented the rare Pacific fisher in proposed logging units and have serious concerns that this logging would not  only degrade habitat for species like the Pacific fisher that require mature forest habitats but would also increase fire risks. The removal of large-diameter trees is detrimental to habitat values and  increases fire risk by removing the most  resilient portions of the landscape, by altering microclimate conditions, and  by creating hotter, drier, more windy  landscapes colonized by a dense, highly  lammable mix of logging slash, fine fuels, dry grass, shrub growth, bushy  stump-sprouting hardwoods, and young  conifers. Converting mature forests into  young, dense growth is the opposite of fuel  reduction and would increase fire risks on  the landscape scale.  According to agency staff, this project  could produce between seven and 14 large timber sales, depending on what is  approved and what units are ultimately moved forward into a final decision. This  level of harvest, combined with the current  BLM logging frenzy in the foothills of  the Applegate, would permanently alter  our beautiful watershed and dramatically  increase fire risks in the mountains that  surround our communities.


Currently, the Forest Service appears  unsure about providing the public with adequate opportunity for commenting on the Yellowjacket Project. They are  also saying the analysis for this massive,  sprawling timber sale that includes much  of the Siskiyou Mountains Ranger District will be capped at a paltry 15 pages, meaning  virtually none of the relevant issues will  be properly considered or analyzed in the  upcoming Environmental Analysis.


The Rogue River-Siskiyou National  Forest is in the process of planning one of the largest Applegate Valley timber sales in many decades, and they are being  pushed by the administration in DC to  log off our public lands without properly  considering the impacts or providing  meaningful public involvement or public-comment opportunities. It’s time for the public to push back and demand  these lands be managed for both the  public interest and future generations, rather than for short-term profits that leave our communities, watersheds, and  forests less resilient, less vibrant, and less  beautiful.




Luke Ruediger 

siskiyoucrest@gmail.com



Image 1: A Pacific fisher documented on the western face of Wagner Butte within mature and old growth forest habitat proposed for logging in unit 278 of the Yellowjacket Project.

bottom of page